To the editor:
With all due respect, the only thing crazy about Mary Madore’s letter (the Times, Tuesday, Sept. 10) regarding the “craziness” of any military action against Syria was the content of the letter itself.
As someone who has made it a part-time job to track, monitor, and document the rhetoric and activities of the far right, overwhelmingly white, Tea Party extremists who now dominate the base of the once great party of Lincoln, reading Ms. Madore’s letter was like listening to Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Rush Limbaugh, and Glen Beck, along with reading the propaganda spewed on blogs and websites like GOPUSA Eagle, Red State, Tea Party Patriots, and Cape Ann’s new, primarily right-wing site that emerged after the Times eliminated anonymous commentary.
Now, Ms. Madore did correctly point out that the Syrian opposition is, in addition to many who seek truly democratic reforms in Damascus, made up of some who seek to impose a strict Islamic state in place of the Assad regime.
But Ms. Madore was, at best, disingenuous, with her inferences that the Syrian opposition is made up of nothing but radical Islamists looking to impose Sharia Law on Syria and slaughter Christians in the process.
Again, Ms. Madore was parroting comments made by Sen. Rand Paul — the man who recently said he thought the long-dead Milton Friedman would be a good choice to head the Federal Reserve when Ben Bernanke steps down. Sen. Paul publicly questioned why President Obama would want to retaliate against Bashar al Assad, despite his use of chemical weapons against innocent civilians, when Assad, according to this senator who aspires to the presidency, is a strong defender of Christians.
The inference was clear. Paul was implying that Obama, by contemplating military action against the dictator in Damascus, was somehow anti-Christian. The theme played well in more than a few right-wing media outlets and blog and websites.