To the editor: Tonight, at 7, Mayor Caroly Kirk will ask City Council to borrow $750,000 to purchase 6 acres, Brierneck Crossing, that has already been permitted and expects Gloucester taxpayers, 12,000 or so, to guarantee the loan.
It appears the mayor believes it is justified to have these 12,000 or so taxpyers pay the developer $750,000 as opposed to having the 25 or 30 unsuccessful neighborhood people who lost the 5- to 10-year court battle against the development pay for it.
If these neighbors do not want this permitted project and feel so strongly against it, then let them put their houses up for collateral, borrow the money and buy the developer out.
Do not let the city front the money, be on the hook for it, and hope the neighborhood group can raise the money and pay it back. Why should a handful of people trump the city’s taxpayers? The developer won fair and square; the neighbors are unhappy with the court decision and are now looking to get out fron under and leave the bill for city taxpayers. Also how much money did the city spend fighting this development in the last 10 years? Add that your tax bill. Is this the precedent the mayor is establishing for the neighborhoods?
It’s time the city steps away from neighborhood disputes and gets out of the development business — I-4, C-2, and Poles Hill — which is more money on the backs of taxpayers. The city administration should not be in the development business solely to due to the fact it’s not its money on the line, it is not vestered, and when the unaudited and overpayments come due, it will again leave it on the backs of taxpayers.
We also being told that $150,000 in Community Preservation Act money is being used to bail out the neighbots. Four times a year, all 12,000 or so city taxpayers have to come up with more money and send it to the Community Preservation Committee so it can dole it out as it sees fit. Case in point, Brierneck Crossing receives the bulk of its money while other more deserving agencies and people get a pittance. The CPA does nothing but add to the cost of living in this city and provide taxpayers’ money to the most influential groups.
I believe the mayor has done a good overall good job, given what she was left to start with. I will continue to support and contribute to her efforts, but I would ask her to refocus her priorities in the best interest of all the taxpayers in the city of Gloucester.
Ralph Hobbs Jr.
Gloucester
RAW: NSA Director Says 50 Plots Foiled
Paige Butcher Scorches on Hawaii Beach
Video: worst way to load cargo onto a plane
Never-before-seen footage of '08 Times Square bomber
Obama: NSA Secret Data Gathering 'Transparent'
WATCH IT: Lil Wayne tramples American flag
Mariah Carey Looks Beautiful in a Tiny Cut-Out Swimsuit
Out of Control Boat Throws Passengers Overboard
See Lindsay Lohan in Rehab
Sofia Vergara Posts Perky Backside Pic in Thong
Gaga Ditches Her Crazy Couture
Caught on Tape: Teacher Accused of Beating Autistic Child
"Stay Classy" Campaign Aims to Curb Binge Drinking
Sesame Street Tackling Tough Topic Parents in Jail
Miss Utah Fumbles Interview Question
Deranged man claims Newark-bound flight was poisoned
Cameron Diaz and Kate Upton Show Off Their Amazing Bikini Bodies
NBA FINALS: Spurs Win Game 5, Lead Series
Exclusive Clip: Jodi Arias: 'Dirty Little Secret'
Amphibious bus filled with tourists sinks
