Gloucester Daily Times
---- — Last week’s announcement by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration that it would steer up to $10 million of seafood import tariff money into a fund designed to upgrade fishing fleets and provide support so fishing communities can transition to their futures was hailed as a good first step toward aiding the industry.
And perhaps that’s what it will be: a very, very, tiny baby step that will do some good over time.
But as Gloucester fishermen Joe DiMaio put it, “there is no time.” And when it comes to Gloucester and New England fishermen’s true needs, there remains no money either.
So to hear Sen. Elizabeth Warren and others proclaiming this NOAA gesture “an excellent chance for our ports” is disappointing, to say the least.
NOAA may build some good PR through trivial acknowledgements such as this, and gestures like the opening of previously closed areas that the smaller Gloucester boats can’t reach, and that big boats can’t afford because of monitoring costs. But our federal government continues to provide none of the disaster aid that fishermen need and deserve. And let no one forget that, as more and more fishermen put their boats and even houses on the block while staving off creditors, this is an “economic disaster” that NOAA and its policies have caused.
The potential $10 million being allocated from tariffs through the 1954 Saltonstall-Kennedy Act may seem significant, until one considers that the law — ignored for decades while NOAA has used tariff dollars to sustain its operations budget – calls for 30 percent of the import money to go toward domestic fisheries, or roughly $130 million last year alone.
And while the idea of NOAA hiring idle fishing boats to undertake cooperative stock assessments with fishermen on board would be a step long, long overdue, the idea of dividing the $10 million into grants of between $30,000 and $250,000 means that money will dry up fast. Indeed, NOAA would provide more help with a buyout program for boats the agency has wrongly forced out of the water — and $250,000 wouldn’t even cover most fishermen’s permits.
Our state and federal lawmakers have to sit up and recognize this absolutely token concession by this still-unaccountable agency for what it is. And they must recognize it’s time to deliver the level of disaster aid that’s needed, before there is no longer a working commercial fishing waterfront to even transition to.