GloucesterTimes.com, Gloucester, MA

Opinion

May 3, 2013

Editorial: DEP beach funding shouldn't block hotel advancement

The finding by the state Department of Environmental Protection that a portion of the proposed Beauport Gloucester Hotel property indeed falls under the state’s Chapter 91 designation, essentially protecting the public’s access to the water, may be seen by some diehard foes of the project as a new reason for blocking the entire project.

Yet even by the DEP’s own findings, it should be nothing of the kind. Indeed, the need for Beauport Gloucester LLC officials to now include “facilities of public accommodation” in its overall design plan should really just play off the public access that hotel developers and proponents had really promised from the start. And in that vein, the DEP finding should, as Marjorie Nesin’s Page 1 Thursday story noted, be embraced by both sides.

In its finding, the DEP confirmed that a “small part of the site” slated for construction falls within a beach area protected by a state Chapter 91 designation. As DEP spokesman Ed Coletta noted, that chapter of Massachusetts General Laws ensures that the public has access to the wetland beach area, and some types of facilities.

Those could include a small restaurant, rest rooms, changing rooms or other such facilities — and those types of facilities were not included in the initial Beauport Gloucester hotel plans, which do call for twin restaurants/functions halls and other amenities inside the planned four-story, 101-room hotel. But Lester B. Smith Jr., Beauport Gloucester LLC’s engineer and environmental consultant says he believes the DEP’s demand “is consistent with what we’re planning.”

And while the Beauport group, headed by New Balance owner Jim Davis and Cruiseport Gloucester’s Sheree DeLorenzo, now has to file an application outlining their plans for the Chapter 91 wetlands work, there’s no reason to think the DEP’s finding should or needs to bring serious revisions for the project, which had full approval of the city’s permitting boards, including the City Council.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion