GloucesterTimes.com, Gloucester, MA

Opinion

October 26, 2012

Letter: Tierney deserves a return to House seat

To the editor:

I first met John Tierney in 1995 when he asked if I would consider helping him in his run for Congress. I agreed and have chaired the finance committee for his successful campaigns since then.

Over this time, I’ve consistently found John to be a bright, hardworking, honest fellow, and a passionate and effective representative for our district. Despite the power and glitter of the position, he’s also never changed, remaining the same down to earth guy from a modest, middle-class family.

Given what I know about John it pains me to see him attacked, and so unfairly and savagely in this campaign. I say “unfair” because the assertion that John knew of the crimes of his brothers in law and his wife’s “willful blindness” is just not true. If there was even a scintilla of evidence against him, be assured that the zealous federal prosecutor who pursued John’s wife would have included a sitting Congressman in those indictments in a heartbeat.

Furthermore, the federal district court judge in Patrice Tierney’s case went so far as to state on the record that John Tierney had no involvement whatsoever in the matter. Yet John’s Republican opponent, sensing a political opportunity, has made John’s “involvement” the centerpiece of his campaign supported by a $3 million nasty advertising blitz from the far right Republican “Young Guns” Super PAC of Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor.

The focus of this election, however, shouldn’t be about John Tierney’s family or about Richard Tisei’s father and mother or his sister and their problems. Rather, it needs to be about our families and how they are affected by the enormous differences between the Democratic and Republican parties on the great issues of the day.

Democrats support investing in affordable and accessible education and job retraining, adequate funding for Medicare and Social Security and for rebuilding our public infrastructure; while Republicans would greatly reduce or eliminate such support to fund further tax cuts for the wealthy and additional trillions for the military budget that the military leadership has not requested. Democrats support a tax policy where everyone including the very wealthy fairly shares the burden; while the Republican party insists on extending the Bush tax cuts to ensure the Romneys of the world a tax rate of 14 percent on $20 million dollars, while their secretaries pay twice that.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Opinion